Meet the StopSOP Slate!

    These 22 lawyers and one paralegal are running on a platform to eliminate the compelled Statement of Principles. They represent regions across the province. You may vote for candidates outside of your own region. Please consider voting for all of them (plus any non-slate candidates endorsed by StopSOP) and ONLY them to ensure that we achieve our goal of electing a Convocation that adheres to its statutory mandate, and gets out of the business of controlling the thoughts and speech of its members. 

    For ease of voting, download the alphabetical list here, or print directly from this webpage.


    Lyon Family Law

    I am joining with #StopSOP as the time has come for more thoughtful and less ideological governance from Osgoode Hall.

    We owe it to ourselves and posterity to rollback the Statement of Principle (SOP). It is beyond the pale how the Law Society deigns to mandate that lawyers proffer some mantra.  The idea that there is a “one size fits all” Statement of Principle is anathema to the profession we serve. 

    My principal concerns with SOP are two fold. First, mandating that we parrot some ideology, any ideology, however laudable, is abhorrent and contrary to our hard won independence. It beggars belief how anyone would suggest such an Orwellian initiative. Second, and notwithstanding the laudable sentiment, those espousing equality, diversity and inclusion cannot get past formulating a useful definition much less any practical implementation.

    The Society’s current overreach is an obvious symptom of mission creep.  Its ever expanding scope of operations is funded with our money and such initiatives are far beyond its proper function.

    The Society must account for every dime it receives and spends.  Before venturing beyond its core mandate it ought to first focus on regulating lawyers and protecting the public and doing so with as little bureaucracy and “red tape” as possible.

    Access to justice is another critical issue requiring practical solutions. In our role of protecting the public we must call government to account. Government must not be allowed to ignore the needs of the legal system.

    We really have to fix the articling/lawyer training model.  The current “system” needs to be re-tooled to produce people who have a working grasp of what it is to practice law.

    If elected I will use my energies to see that the Law Society focuses on its core mandate with a view to cost reductions and savings wherever possible.  Having run my own business for over 30 years I know that one must be ever mindful of the bottom-line. Perhaps that is something the Benchers have forgotten in their efforts at social justice engineering.

    Called to the Bar in 1989 I have been practicing for 30 years. I operate a small family law firm in Kanata employing four lawyers.  I still feel it is a privilege to practice law and hope to continue to do so for many years to come.  My practice focuses on dispute resolution.  I am a member of various and diverse legal and ADR groups.  For over ten years I was a regular columnist for the Lawyers Weekly and had fun writing articles under the title “In the Trenches”.  When not in the office I maintain a semblance of sanity by playing hockey in the winter and, after ice out, fly fishing and kayaking in the summer.